














 | | 
|
Ropemakers bail out from Harlow North
See
our latest newsletter
|
|
Representation
on the Further Proposed Changes to the draft East of England Plan
Thank you for submitting comments on the Further
Proposed Changes to the Draft East of England Plan. The deadline for
submissions has now passed.
We will ask the Government Office for the East of England for a copy of
their analysis of the responses, but know that around 1800 individual
responses were received via this website (generating over 7000 objections
to specific sections of the Plan) with many more submissions on postcards
or by letter. We will also press GO-East for the expected timescale
for the comments to be incorporated into the Plan and a revision to be
released. As soon as we have further information then we will advise
members accordingly.
Click here to see STOP
Harlow North's response
Again - many thanks for another successful campaign |
The East of England Plan is due to be published soon.
Please
write to the new Housing Minister, Caroline Flint, MP, to make sure she
knows your views on Harlow North.
The
suggested text for a letter is here
|
All
change!!
Gordon Brown has introduced new roles and
responsibilities for the ministers in his first government, that will
impact impending decisions on Harlow North. The new incumbents
will, no doubt, have been briefed with the 'party line' on the draft
East of England Plan - but we need YOU to let them know the strength of
local feeling on the subject.
We have written five standard letters which you
can print off, or download and edit then send to the four relevant ministers.
You need to add you name and address and date the letters. The
first letter is to Gordon
Brown and focuses on the cost to the taxpayer of this scheme -
Ropemakers have not committed to fund any infrastructure. The
second is to Hilary
Benn, Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary (DEFRA). This
letter focuses on the serious environmental impact of the scheme.
The third is to Hazel
Blears, who replaced Ruth Kelly, as Communities and Local Government
Secretary, and describes the serious flaws in preparation of the Plan
and its consequent irrationality and, probably, illegality. The
fourth is to Barbara
Follett, the minister with responsibility for the East of England,
and highlights the immediate local concerns over the Plan as it
currently stands. The fifth is to the newly-appointed Housing
Minister, Caroline Flint
Please send all five letters today and
encourage friends and family to do so as well.
(Note You may be asked
to 'Enter Network Password' when you click these hyperlinks; please ignore this and click 'Cancel') |
The
Message is getting home
You may not have received an
individual response to letters you have written to the new Ministers
(see left), but they have been noted. We received the following
communication from GO-East:
As a general rule, we do not to respond
individually to large volumes of campaign correspondence (ie duplicate or
template letters) as it is simply impractical to do so. It is accepted
practice to respond to a campaign leader/head with a response to the
issues raised in such campaign letters and ask the campaign leader/head to
filter this response down to their campaign members whilst also outlining
the impracticality (time/expense etc) of answering every letter
individually. In addition, we keep a record of the volumes received and
make sure this information is passed to relevant officials.
Bearing in mind the above, I have
attached a response to the letters from your colleagues and I would be
grateful if you could disseminate it to the other members of your
campaign.
Mike Harris
Development & Infrastructure
GO East
Tel: 01223 372740
GTN: 3841 2740
Fax: 01223 372862
Click here
to see the response referred to above
|
THANK
YOU
... to everyone who registered their objections to the
re-introduction by Ruth Kelly's department of plans for major
development north of Harlow, after these had been removed from the draft
East of England Plan by the independent Inspector following extensive
and detailed consideration by his panel of experts. We believe at
least 5,000 individual submissions objecting to the current policy for
massive expansion of Harlow have been sent to GO-East, including over 2,650
responses received via this website.
The Secretary of State is required by law to
note the outcome of the public consultation, and we await her
decision - due mid-year - with more than passing interest. In the
meantime STOP Harlow North will not be idle; in particular we are taking
advice on the legality of some aspects of the way the East of England
Plan has been developed so far.
So... thanks again and WATCH
THIS SPACE for further developments
|
|
Proposed
Changes to the draft East of England Plan
Ruth
Kelly has completely ignored the recommendations from the independent
Inspector, public opinion and the experts by proposing to re-instate
Harlow North
On
19 December, Ruth Kelly's Department for Communities and Local Government (now
there's an irony!) issued their proposed
changes to the draft East of England Plan. These were meant to
reflect the recommendations from the independent Inspector of the Plan,
whose proposals had taken account of the weight of public opinion
expressed during the first round of public consultation and of the
weight of expert technical evidence presented during the four-month long
Examination in Public. The DCLG's proposed changes are now subject to a second, and
final, round of public consultation until 9 March 2007.
|

Reproduced with kind permission of the Daily Telegraph
|
STOP
PRESS
The report which Ruth
Kelly chose to ignore is released. Rye Meads
sewage works will constrain growth
The long-awaited study of sewage treatment capacity called for by the
independent Inspector at the Examination in Public (EiP) has been
published.
The results are damning
The study looked at the reduced level of growth around Harlow
recommended by the Panel - without Harlow North. It concluded that, even
then, Rye Meads cannot cope without massive investment; investment that is
not guaranteed by the Government or OFWAT.
See our latest Press Release |
|
Incredibly,
the DCLG has overruled its own planning experts and put Harlow North
back into the Plan. They don't offer solutions to any of the
major problems that major development north of Harlow would pose and,
instead, simply say that expansion of Harlow is an overwhelming (political?)
priority. Ropemakers are, of course, delighted at the prospect
of achieving their long-held ambition of concreting over swathes of our greenfield
land.We
now have a major battle on our hands to ensure that Harlow North is
omitted from the final version of the Plan, by expressing our views as
loudly as possible through the final public consultation. We are
not alone, of course; Herts County Council, East Herts Council and Mark
Prisk MP have all expressed their
dismay at Ruth Kelly's decision and will be fighting alongside us. |
| PPS11
is the official policy on preparation of Regional Spatial Strategies,
including the East of England Plan. PPS11 specifically prohibits
making representation to Government whilst Proposed Changes (from
the independent Inspector's report following an Examination in Public) are being developed, otherwise this
"would undermine the examination process and be prejudicial to
other participants". However on 13 July 2006, whilst
Ruth Kelly's department was considering its Proposed Changes, Bill
Rammell (MP for Harlow) met with
one of DCLG's senior ministers "to discuss housing and
infrastructure issues". GO-East has refused our request under
Freedom of Information to release minutes of this meeting, and now Mark
Prisk MP has raised the matter with the Speaker of the House of
Commons. Mark's pursuit of an explanation for Rammell's action has
been widely reported in the national
and local press. Please read our
full statement on this
revelation |
STOP
Harlow North believes Ropemaker Properties Limited's
proposals are
Unnecessary
Unsustainable
Undemocratic
Visitor Number
| |
|
This site
presents the aims and objectives of the STOP
Harlow North action
group. We are dedicated to positively
and actively opposing proposals by Ropemaker Pro-
perties Limited
and its associated landowners to create a major development
north of Harlow around the Hertfordshire villages of Eastwick, Gilston, High
Wych, Hunsdon
and Widford, and the town of Sawbridgeworth, on
the basis that the locality needs:
 |
A better
Harlow, not a bigger Harlow. Any development north of Harlow will compete
with the existing town and hamper its regeneration
|
 |
To protect
our environment. Greenbelt is there for a reason and should not be built on
until all other alternatives have been exhausted.
|
 |
To protect
the unique identity and historic character of rural villages
|
 |
To bring
back fairness and democracy in the strategic planning process.
|
If you
support one or more of these aims then please contact us by e-mail
to find out how you can help ...or keep visiting this site for
updates
|
|