Home
What's proposed?
Gilston Great Park
Contact us
Join Us
Press Releases
Newsletters
Comments
No Comments
3 U's
Links
Timeline
BP stands for...
Aircraft Noise
Worth Preserving
FAQ's

STOP Harlow North

Unnecessary                                        Unsustainable                                        Undemocratic

 

  East of England Plan published

See our latest newsletter

Representation on the Further Proposed Changes to the draft East of England Plan

Thank you for submitting comments on the Further Proposed Changes to the Draft East of England Plan.  The deadline for submissions has now passed.
We will ask the Government Office for the East of England for a copy of their analysis of the responses, but know that around 1800 individual responses were received via this website (generating over 7000 objections to specific sections of the Plan) with many more submissions on postcards or by letter.  We will also press GO-East for the expected timescale for the comments to be incorporated into the Plan and a revision to be released.  As soon as we have further information then we will advise members accordingly.
Click here to see STOP Harlow North's response

Again - many thanks for another successful campaign

The East of England Plan is due to be published soon.

Please write to the new Housing Minister, Caroline Flint, MP, to make sure she knows your views on Harlow North.

The suggested text for a letter is here

 

All change!!
Gordon Brown has introduced new roles and responsibilities for the ministers in his first government, that will impact impending decisions on Harlow North.  The new incumbents will, no doubt, have been briefed with the 'party line' on the draft East of England Plan - but we need YOU to let them know the strength of local feeling on the subject.

We have written five standard letters which you can print off, or download and edit then send to the four relevant ministers. You need to add you name and address and date the letters.  The first letter is to Gordon Brown and focuses on the cost to the taxpayer of this scheme - Ropemakers have not committed to fund any infrastructure.  The second is to Hilary Benn, Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary (DEFRA). This letter focuses on the serious environmental impact of the scheme.  The third is to Hazel Blears, who replaced Ruth Kelly, as Communities and Local Government Secretary, and describes the serious flaws in preparation of the Plan and its consequent irrationality and, probably, illegality.  The fourth is to Barbara Follett, the minister with responsibility for the East of England, and highlights the immediate local concerns over the Plan as it currently stands.  The fifth is to the newly-appointed Housing Minister, Caroline Flint

Please send all five letters today and encourage friends and family to do so as well.
(Note You may be asked to 'Enter Network Password' when you click these hyperlinks; please ignore this and click 'Cancel')

The Message is getting home

You may not have received an individual response to letters you have written to the new Ministers (see left), but they have been noted.  We received the following communication from GO-East:

As a general rule, we do not to respond individually to large volumes of campaign correspondence (ie duplicate or template letters) as it is simply impractical to do so. It is accepted practice to respond to a campaign leader/head with a response to the issues raised in such campaign letters and ask the campaign leader/head to filter this response down to their campaign members whilst also outlining the impracticality (time/expense etc) of answering every letter individually. In addition, we keep a record of the volumes received and make sure this information is passed to relevant officials.

Bearing in mind the above, I have attached a response to the letters from your colleagues and I would be grateful if you could disseminate it to the other members of your campaign.

Mike Harris
Development & Infrastructure
GO East
Tel: 01223 372740
GTN: 3841 2740
Fax: 01223 372862

Click here to see the response referred to above

THANK YOU
... to everyone who registered their objections to the re-introduction by Ruth Kelly's department of plans for major development north of Harlow, after these had been removed from the draft East of England Plan by the independent Inspector following extensive and detailed consideration by his panel of experts.  We believe at least 5,000 individual submissions objecting to the current policy for massive expansion of Harlow have been sent to GO-East, including over 2,650 responses received via this website.

The Secretary of State is required by law to note the outcome of the public consultation, and we await her decision - due mid-year - with more than passing interest.  In the meantime STOP Harlow North will not be idle; in particular we are taking advice on the legality of some aspects of the way the East of England Plan has been developed so far.

So... thanks again and WATCH THIS SPACE for further developments

Proposed Changes to the draft East of England Plan

Ruth Kelly has completely ignored the recommendations from the independent Inspector, public opinion and the experts by proposing to re-instate Harlow North

On 19 December, Ruth Kelly's Department for Communities and Local Government (now there's an irony!) issued their proposed changes to the draft East of England Plan.  These were meant to reflect the recommendations from the independent Inspector of the Plan, whose proposals had taken account of the weight of public opinion expressed during the first round of public consultation and of the weight of expert technical evidence presented during the four-month long Examination in Public. The DCLG's proposed changes are now subject to a second, and final, round of public consultation until 9 March 2007.


Reproduced with kind permission of the Daily Telegraph

STOP PRESS

The report which Ruth Kelly chose to ignore is released.  Rye Meads sewage works will constrain growth

The long-awaited study of sewage treatment capacity called for by the independent Inspector at the Examination in Public (EiP) has been published.

The results are damning

The study looked at the reduced level of growth around Harlow recommended by the Panel - without Harlow North. It concluded that, even then, Rye Meads cannot cope without massive investment; investment that is not guaranteed by the Government or OFWAT.

See our latest Press Release

Incredibly, the DCLG has overruled its own planning experts and put Harlow North back into the Plan.  They don't offer solutions to any of the major problems that major development north of Harlow would pose and, instead, simply say that expansion of Harlow is an overwhelming (political?) priority.  Ropemakers are, of course, delighted at the prospect of achieving their long-held ambition of concreting over swathes of our greenfield land.We now have a major battle on our hands to ensure that Harlow North is omitted from the final version of the Plan, by expressing our views as loudly as possible through the final public consultation.  We are not alone, of course; Herts County Council, East Herts Council and Mark Prisk MP have all expressed their dismay at Ruth Kelly's decision and will be fighting alongside us.

PPS11 is the official policy on preparation of Regional Spatial Strategies, including the East of England Plan.  PPS11 specifically  prohibits making representation to Government whilst Proposed Changes (from the independent Inspector's report following an Examination in Public) are being developed, otherwise this "would undermine the examination process and be prejudicial to other participants".  However on  13 July 2006, whilst Ruth Kelly's department was considering its Proposed Changes, Bill Rammell (MP for Harlow) met with one of DCLG's senior ministers "to discuss housing and infrastructure issues".  GO-East has refused our request under Freedom of Information to release minutes of this meeting, and now Mark Prisk MP has raised the matter with the Speaker of the House of Commons.  Mark's pursuit of an explanation for Rammell's action has been widely reported in the national and local press.  Please read  our full statement on this revelation

 

STOP Harlow North believes Ropemaker Properties Limited's proposals are

Unnecessary

Unsustainable

Undemocratic

Visitor Number

This site presents the aims and objectives of the STOP Harlow North action group.  We are dedicated to positively and actively opposing proposals by Ropemaker Pro-
perties Limited
and its associated landowners to create a major development north of Harlow around the Hertfordshire villages of Eastwick, Gilston, High Wych, Hunsdon and Widford, and the town of Sawbridgeworth, on the basis that the locality needs:

A better Harlow, not a bigger Harlow. Any development north of Harlow will compete with the existing town and hamper its regeneration

To protect our environment. Greenbelt is there for a reason and should not be built on until all other alternatives have been exhausted.

To protect the unique identity and historic character of rural villages

To bring back fairness and democracy in the strategic planning process.

If you support one or more of these aims then please contact us by e-mail to find out how you can help ...or keep visiting this site for updates